Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. June 22, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Image Processing Technologies, LLC’s (“IPT”) Daubert Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Michael E. Tate (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 14. IPT’s Motion seeks to exclude opinions from Samsung’s damages expert Michael E. Tate (“Mr. Tate”). After due consideration, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART the Motion. In addition, the Court DENIES IPT’s motion in limine No. 8, which requests the Court to preclude Samsung from discussing certain alleged non-infringing alternatives. I.