Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. June 29, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00050, Dkt. No. 200
Decided
June 29, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 195 Opposed MOTION to Continue Trial filed by Image Processing Technologies, LLC
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Image Processing Technolog ies, LLC’s (“IPT”) Opposed Motion to Continue Trial (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 195.) Also , before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Samsung”) Statement in Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue (the “Response”) (Dkt. No. 196) and IPT’s Response in Support of Its Mot ion to Continue Trial (the “Reply”) (Dkt. No. 197).