Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. June 26, 2020)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00050, Dkt. No. 194
Decided
June 26, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 129 SEALED PATENT MOTION [CORRECTED] Motion to Strike Parts of Supplemental Expert Report of Michael E. Tate filed by Image Processing Technologies, LLC
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Image Processing Technologies, Inc.’s (“IPT”) Corrected Motion to Strike Parts of Supplemental Expert Report of Michael E. Tate (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 129. IPT’s Motion seeks to strike parts of the Supplemental Expert Report of Michael E. Tate (“2020 Tate Report”) served by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) on April 29, 2020. I. INTRODUCTION The present case is severed from Case No.