Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. June 18, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00050, Dkt. No. 180
Decided
June 18, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 25 SEALED MOTION Samsung's Motion to Strike and Exclude Portions of The Expert Reports of Plaintiff's Experts Dr. Bovik and Dr. Zavadsky [ Filed Originally in Case No. 2:16-CV-00505-JRG at Dkt No. 212] filed by Samsung E…
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.’s and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (“Samsung”) Motion to Strike and Exclude Portions of the Expert Reports of Plaintiff’s Experts Dr. Bovik and Dr. Zavadsky (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 25. Samsung’s Motion seeks to strike portions of Plaintiff Image Processing Technologies, LLC’s (“IPT”) technical experts Dr. Bovik’s and Dr. Zavadsky’s reports. Samsung filed a notice indicating that §IV. E. and §IV. F. of their Motion are now moot. After due consideration, the Court DENIES the Motion.