Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. May 14, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00050, Dkt. No. 124
Decided
May 14, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 26 SEALED MOTION Samsung's Motion to Exclude Portions of the Testimony of IPT's Damages Expert Mr. Paul C. Benoit [Filed Originally in Case No. 2:16-CV-00505 at Dkt. No. 213] filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsu…
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.’s and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Samsung”) Motion to Exclude Portions of the Testimony of Image Processing’s Damages Expert Mr. Paul C. Benoit (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 26. The Motion seeks to exclude Plaintiff Image Processing Technologies, LLC’s (“IPT”) damages expert Mr. Benoit’s opinions as to a reasonable royalty, both of Mr. Benoit’s supplements, and both his original and new effective royalty rate opinions. Dkt. No. 26 at 19.