Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. May 12, 2020)

Granted in Part
Discovery Daubert / Expert Challenges Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00050, Dkt. No. 121
Decided
May 12, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 92 SEALED PATENT MOTION Corrected Motion for Leave to Serve Second Supplemental Expert Report of Paul C. Benoit filed by Image Processing Technologies, LLC
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two motions. First is Plaintiff Image Processing Technologies, LLC’s (“IPT”) Motion for Leave to Serve Second Supplemental Expert Report of Paul C. Benoit (“Motion for Leave”). Dkt. No. 92. The second motion is Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.’s and Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Samsung”) purported Cross Motion to Strike the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Paul C. Benoit (“Motion to Strike”). Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case