Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. May 14, 2020)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00050, Dkt. No. 123
Decided
May 14, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 17 SEALED MOTION Image Processing's Conditional Motion for Leave to Supplement Expert Reports [Filed originally in Case No. 2:16-CV-0505-JRG at Dkt. No. 219] filed by Image Processing Technologies, LLC
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Image Processing Technologies, LLC’s (“IPT”) Conditional Motion for Leave to Supplement Expert Reports (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 17. IPT’s Motion seeks leave to formally serve supplemental reports assertedly to address newly raised positions regarding alleged non-infringing alternatives presented by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”) in their August 25, 2017 supplemental rebuttal expert report of Dr. Stevenson. Id. at 4. IPT has a pending motion to strike Dr.