Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:20-cv-00050 (E.D. Tex. June 18, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00050, Dkt. No. 178
Decided
June 18, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 90 SEALED PATENT MOTION - Samsung's Motion to Bifurcate Willfuness filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

B efore the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. ’s (collectively, “Samsung”) Motion to Bifurcate Willfulness (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 90.) Having considered the Motion and the briefing, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be and hereby is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Image Processing Technologies, LLC (“IPT”) sued Samsung on May 13, 2016 for infringement of various patents, including U.S. Patent No. 6,959,293 (the “ʼ293 Patent,” or the “Asserted Patent”).