Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 27, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 468
Decided
January 27, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Micron Technology, Inc.’s Daubert Motion and Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Mr. David Kennedy. Dkt. No. 273. Additionally, Plaintiff Netlist, Inc. has filed a Motion for Leave to Supplement Expert Report of Mr. David Kennedy. Dkt. No. 425. I. BACKGROUND Netlist’s Complaint originally asserted six patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 10,860,506; 10,949,339; 11,016,918; 11,232,054; 8,787,060; and 9,318,160. Dkt. No. 1. Netlist has since dropped the ’506 and ’339 Patents from this case. See Dkt. No. 406 at 108; Dkt. No. 250.