Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 27, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 467
Decided
January 27, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Netlist’s Motion seeks to strike portions of Micron’s technical expert Dr. Gary Woods’s opening and rebuttal reports regarding the ’060 and ’160 Patents. Dkt. No. 270; Dkt. No. 270- 2 (“Opening Report”); Dkt. No. 270- 3 (“Rebuttal Report”). Micron opposed the Motion with a response and sur-reply. Dkt. No. 291; Dkt. No. 360. I. BACKGROUND Netlist’s Complaint originally asserted six patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 10,860,506; 10,949,339; 11,016,918; 11,232,054; 8,787,060; and 9,318,160. Dkt. No. 1.