Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2024)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 478
Decided
January 31, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 421 Report and Recommendations,, Motions terminated: 280 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment Dismissing Micron's Affirmative Defense of Breach of RAND Obligation Or In The Alternative for Severan…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Netlist, Inc. previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment that the Asserted Patents are Not Standard Essential (Dkt. No. 276) and a Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Micron’s Affirmative Defense of Breach of RAND Obligation or in the Alternative for Severance (Dkt. No. 280.) Magistrate Ju dge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 421), recommending grant for portions of Netlist’s motions not found moot. Micron has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 441).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case