Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2024)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 421
Decided
January 8, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 280 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment Dismissing Micron's Affirmative Defense of Breach of RAND Obligation Or In The Alternative for Severance filed by Netlist, Inc., 276 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment Tha…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment regarding whether the asserted patents are standard essential , both filed by Netlist, Inc. First, Netlist’s Motion for Summary Judgment that the Asserted Patents are Not Standard Essential. Dkt. No. 276. Second, Netlist’s Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Micron’s Affirmative Defense of Breach of R AND Obligation or in the Alternative for Severance. Dkt. No. 280. For the following reasons, the Court recommends that Netlist’s Motions be GRANTED, except for the portions found moot. I.