Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2024)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 459
Decided
January 25, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - granting 393 Netlists Motion to Compel Micron to Produce Clawed-Back Documents
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Compel Micron to Produce Clawed- Back Documents, filed by Plaintiff Netlist, Inc. Dkt. No. 393. Defendants Micron Technology, Inc. et al opposed the relief, and the Motion was argued at a hearing. See Dkt. No. 399; Dkt. No. 406. Having heard argument at the hearing, Micron was excused from filing a response, except to provide the disputed document for in camera review. Dkt. No. 406 at 129. I. BACKGROUND The document in question is Appendix 1 to Dr. Woods’s expert report served by Micron on October 4, 2023. Dkt. No.