Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 26, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 462
Decided
January 26, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 197 SEALED MOTION Netlist's Motion to Strike Micron's Newly Disclosed Witnesses filed by Netlist, Inc., 316 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION for Leave to Supplement Expert Reports filed filed by Netlist, Inc., 267 OPPOSED SEALED MO…
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are five motions filed by Netlist, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. et al regarding witness testimony. First, Netlist’s Motion to Supplement Expert Reports. Dkt. No. 316. Second, Netlist’s Motion to Strike Newly Disclosed Witnesses. Dkt. No. 197. Third, Netlist’s Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Defendants’ Expert John B. Halbert. Dkt. No. 267. Fourth, Micron’s Motion to Strike Expert Report of Dr. Brogioli. Dkt. No. 271. Fifth, Micron’s Daubert Motion and Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Dr. William Henry Mangione-Smith. Dkt.