Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 26, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 466
Decided
January 26, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two motions to strike filed by Plaintiff Netlist, Inc. First is Netlist’s Motion to Strike Opinions of Dr. Matthew Lynde. Dkt. No. 268. Second is Netlist’s Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Defendants’ Expert Dr. Harold Stone. Dkt. No. 269. I. BACKGROUND Netlist’s Complaint originally asserted six patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 10,860,506; 10,949,339; 11,016,918; 11,232,054; 8,787,060; and 9,318,160. Dkt. No. 1. Netlist has since dropped the ’506 and ’339 Patents from this case. See Dkt. No. 406 at 108; Dkt. No. 250.