Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 19, 2024)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 494
Decided
February 19, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 438 Report and Recommendations, Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Alternative Motion for Leave to Assert Patent Misuse Affirmative Defense (Dkt. No.…
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Micron previously filed a n Alternative Motion for Leave to Assert Patent Misuse Affirmative Defense (Dkt. No. 222) and Netlist previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Patent Misuse (Dkt. No. 277) and a Motion to Strike Micron Defendants ’ Affirmative Defense of Patent Misuse (Dkt. No. 193) . Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 438), recommending grant of Netlist’s Motion to Strike, denial of Micron’s Motion for Leave, and denial as moot of the Motion for Summary Judgment.