Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Netlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 15, 2024)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 438
Decided
January 15, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 222 SEALED MOTION Defendants' Alternative Motion for Leave to Assert Patent Misuse Affirmative Defense Nunc Pro Tunc filed by Micron Semiconductor Products Inc, Micron Technology, Inc., Micron Technology Texas …
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are several motions related to the affirmativ e def ense of patent misuse asserted by Defendants Micron Technology, Inc. et al. First is Netlist, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Micron Defendants’ Af firmative Defense o f Patent Misu se (Dkt. No. 193). Seco nd is Micron’s Alternative Motion for Leave to Assert Patent Misuse Affirmative Defense (Dkt. No. 222). Third is Netlist’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Patent Misuse (Dkt. No. 277). I. BACKGROUND Netlist’s Complaint originally asserted six patents, U.S. Patent Nos.