Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00413 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 14, 2024)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00413, Dkt. No. 841
Decided
February 14, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Bench Trial set for 3/26/2024 at 08:30 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Court OVERRULES Samsung and Techiyas Objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the motion to…
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) previously filed a motion to dismiss all asserted patent claims on two bases : (1) that these claims are “irreparably tainted by [Counterclaim Defendants] Ahn and Cho wrongfully seeking out, taking, using, and disclosing Samsung’s privileged information about this case,” and (2) that the “bad faith misconduct” of Counterclaim Defendant Synergy warrant s the Court’s use of its inherent power to dismiss the case. (Dkt. No. 779 at 1).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case