Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00413 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00413, Dkt. No. 973
Decided
August 29, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motion(s)952 terminated)
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opposed Motion for Entry of Bill of Costs (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”). (Dkt. No. 952.) Having considered the Motion, the Court finds it should be and hereby is GRANTED-IN-PART, DENIED-IN-PART, and CARRIED-IN-PART. I. BACKGROUND On November 5, 2021, Plaintiff Staton Techiya, LLC (“ Techiya”) and Synergy IP Corporation (“Synergy”)1 filed suit against Samsung, alleging infringement of several patents. (Dkt. No.