Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00413 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2024)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is the Bill of Costs Supplemental (the “Supplement”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”). (Dkt. No. 978.) On August 29, 2024, the Court requested further information regarding Samsung’s Opposed Motion for Entry of Bill of Costs (the “Motion”) (Dkt. No. 952). (Dkt. No. 973.) Having considered the Motion and Supplement, the Court finds that Samsung’s Motion s hould be and hereby is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error