Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00413 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00413, Dkt. No. 991
Decided
November 8, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Bill of Costs Supplemental (the “Supplement”) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”). (Dkt. No. 978.) On August 29, 2024, the Court requested further information regarding Samsung’s Opposed Motion for Entry of Bill of Costs (the “Motion”) (Dkt. No. 952). (Dkt. No. 973.) Having considered the Motion and Supplement, the Court finds that Samsung’s Motion s hould be and hereby is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I.