Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00413 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2023)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00413, Dkt. No. 700
Decided
October 18, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 365 SEALED MOTION to Drop Synergy IP Corporation As a Plaintiff Pursuant to Rule 21 filed by Synergy IP Corporation, Staton Techiya, LLC
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion To Drop Synergy IP Corporation As A Plaintiff Pursuant To Rule 21 (Dkt. No. 365), filed by Plaintiffs Staton Techiya, LLC and Synergy IP Corporation. Plaintiffs rep resent that when th e suit was filed, Sy nergy was the exclusive licensee of Staton Techiya and thus had standing to sue. However, they represent that on February 6, 2023, that license was terminated and Synergy no longer has standing to be a plaintiff. Samsung opposes the motion.