Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00413 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2023)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00413, Dkt. No. 718
Decided
November 5, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 443 SEALED PATENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INFRINGEMENT OF THE 400 PATENT filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 434 SEALED PATENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON LAC…
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are four Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively “Samsung”). First, Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of the ’982 Patent. Dkt. No. 436. Second, Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of the ’259 Patent. Dkt. No. 442. Third, Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of the ’400 Patent. Dkt. No. 443. Finally, Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Lack of Entitlement to Damages for Techiya.