Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Staton Techiya, LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00413 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2023)

Denied
Motion to Dismiss Venue / Transfer
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00413, Dkt. No. 355
Decided
March 24, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 259 Report and Recommendations, Court OVERRULES Counterclaim Defendants Objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 109) is DENIED
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Staton Techiya, LLC, Synergy IP Corporation, Seung-Ho Ahn, and Sungil Cho (collectively “Counterclaim Defendants”) previously filed a motion to dismiss under the doctrine of forum non conveniens and to for failure to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 109.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 259) recommending that the motion be denied. Counterclaim Defendants have filed Objections (Dkt. No. 307), with Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively “Samsung”) filing a response (Dkt. No. 330).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case