Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01112 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01112, Dkt. No. 979
Decided
October 2, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Continue Trial Date (Dkt. No. 962) (“Mot.”) filed by Apple Inc. (“Apple”). Apple requests a continuance of the trial date until after the completion of post-trial briefing so that the “Court can both (1) enforce ContentGuard’s stipulation and/or (2) enforce collateral estoppel rising from the Google trial judgment.” (Mot. at 9.) Plaintiff ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. (“ContentGuard”) o pposes the Motion. (Dkt. No. 974) (“Opp.”). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED.