Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01112 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 5, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01112, Dkt. No. 982
Decided
October 5, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Joint Renewed Motio n for Judgment on the Pleadings Declaring All Asserted Patent Claims Invalid Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. No. 539 in the -1112 case; Dkt. No. 191 in the -61 case) (“Mot.”) fi led by Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Go ogle, Inc., Huawei Technologi es Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., HTC Corp., HTC America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Tele communications America, LLC (c ollectively, “Defendants”).