Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01112 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01112, Dkt. No. 468
Decided
March 30, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant Apple Inc. ’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedur e 12(b)(6) (“MTD”) (Dkt. No. 95) and Defendant Apple Inc.’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b )(6) (“Renewed Motion”) (Dkt. No. 254) and their respective briefing. The Court held a hearing on this motion on November 18, 2014. APPLICABLE LAW The Federal Circuit “review[s] a district c ourt’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under the law of the regional circuit.