Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01112 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2015)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01112, Dkt. No. 1022
Decided
November 7, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION on 692 ContentGuard's Motion to Exclude Portions of the Reports and Testimony of Dr. John P.J. Kelly
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the carried portion of the Motion to Exclude Portions of the Reports and Testimony of Dr. John P.J. Kelly (Dkt. No. 692 (“Mot.”)) filed by Plaintiff ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. (“ContentGuard”) in regard to the allegation by ContentGuard that Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) relies on evidence that was not produced during the discovery process. For the reasons set forth below, the previously carried portion of the motion to strike is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND The Court held a hearing on this motion on August 5, 2015. (Dkt. No.