Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01112 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01112, Dkt. No. 456
Decided
March 19, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the briefing on a numbe r of motions to sever and/or transfer, supplemental motions to certain of those moti ons, and a handful of supplemental notices to various motions1: Motorola’s (“Motorola”) Motion to Sever and Suppl emental Submission (Dkt. Nos. 55, 153); Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Sever and Transfer (Dkt. No. 156); Defendants HTC, Huawei and Sa msung’s Motion to Sever (Dkt. No. 174); Amazon’s Motion to Sever (Dkt. No.