Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01112 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 14, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01112, Dkt. No. 991
Decided
October 14, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Pa rtial Reconsideration of the Court’s Claim Construction Decision Based on Intervenin g Supreme Court Authority. (Dkt. No. 480.) Defendant Apple joined the motion on April 13, 2015. (Dkt. No. 490.) Also before the Court is the response of Plaintiff Conten tGuard, Defendants’ reply ther eto, and Plaintiff’s sur-reply thereto. (Dkt. Nos. 552, 581, 606.) The Court held a hearing on this motion in conjunction with a hearing on various post- trial motions on September 1, 2015. (See Dkt. No.