Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01112 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01112, Dkt. No. 459
Decided
March 20, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
144 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Conten tGuard Holdings, Inc.’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 304),1 the response of Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”), Apple Inc., DirecTV, LLC, HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) (Dkt. No. 331), Defendant Amazon.com, Inc.’s Separate Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No.