Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01112 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 25, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-01112, Dkt. No. 1153
Decided
April 25, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Order SUPERSEDES this Court’s previous Memorandum Opinion and Order (Dkt. No. 1150) denying the Renewed Motion For Judgment as a Matter of Law with Respect to the Apple Trial or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial (Dkt. No. 1106, “Inf. JMOL”) filed by Plaintiff ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. (“ContentGuard”) and the Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Patent Invalidity and Alternative Motion for a New Trial (Dkt. No. 1104, “Inv. JMOL”) filed Defendant Apple Inc.