ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01112 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 18, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law With Respect To The Apple Trial Or, In The Alte rnative, For A New Trial (Dkt. No. 1106, “Inf. JMOL”) filed by Plaintiff ContentGuard Holdi ngs, Inc. (“ContentGuard”) and the Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Pa tent Invalidity And A lternative Motion For A New Trial (Dkt. No. 1104, “Inv. JMOL”) filed Defenda nt Apple Inc. (“Apple”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that these motions should both be DENIED. I.