Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00153 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 21, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00153, Dkt. No. 617
Decided
April 21, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Currently before the Court is the “Motion of SAP America, Inc. and SAP AG For Relief From Judgment Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) or 60(b) Or For A Stay” (Dkt. No. 598), filed on January 21, 2014 and renewed on March 27, 2014 (Dkt. No. 615). Request for a stay: Defendants seek a stay on three grounds, each of which will be addressed in turn: (1) based on the “Stipulated Order on Execution of Judg ment,” (2) based upon the pendency of the Executive Benefits case in the U.S.