Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00153 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2011)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00153, Dkt. No. 572
Decided
September 9, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Defendants are hereby restrained and enjoined, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d), from any further infringement of United States Patent No. 6,553,350 B2 as stated in the Per…
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs ‟ Versata Software, Inc., f/k/a Trilogy Software, Inc. and Versata Development Group, f/k/a Versata Development Group, Inc., (collectively, “Plaintiff” or “Versata”) motions for a permanent injunction. (Dkt. Nos. 347 and 535.) Defendants SAP America, Inc. and SAP AG (collectively, “Defendants” or “SAP”) oppose the motion for permanent injunction. The Court held full evidentiary hearings on the issue of a permanent injunction on March 9, 2010 and June 7, 2011.