Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00153 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2011)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants SAP America, Inc. ‘s and SAP AG ‘s (collectively, ―SAP‖) motion for judgment as a matter of law (―JMOL‖) on the issues relating to damages or in the alternative new trial or remittitur (Dkt. No. 556). In general, Defendants argue that: (1) Versata failed to prove that it is entitled to lost profits; (2) the jury‘s reasonable royalty verdict lacks evidentiary foundation; (3) the Court should order a new trial or remittitur; and (4) SAP‘s other motions for JMOL,…