Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00153 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 21, 2010)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00153, Dkt. No. 410
Decided
December 21, 2010
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Denying SAP's affirmative defense and counterclaim of inequitable conduct on the '400 and '350 patents
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants SAP America, Inc. and SAP, AG’s (“SAP’s”) claim of inequitable conduct. The Court conducted a bench trial on April 27, 2010 on SAP’s claim of inequitable conduct and the parties submitted briefing supporting their positions prior to the trial. (Dkt. Nos. 352, 358, 367, 371). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendants’ claim of inequitable conduct on the ‘400 and ‘350 patents. 1 I.