Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00153 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 17, 2014)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00153, Dkt. No. 611
Decided
March 17, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Currently before the Court is Versata’s Mo tion Under Fed. R. Ci v. P. 58(d), (Dkt. No. 601), filed by Plaintiffs on February 6, 2014. The motion has now been fully briefed and, for the reasons set forth below, is GRANTED. Both parties have, in the Court’s view, unnecessarily complicated this motion. While the litigation has undoubtedly been comp lex, this motion should not be. The Court begins with the undeniable premise that a final judgment was entered in this case on September 9, 2011 (Dkt. No. 576, entitled “Final Judgment”).