Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00153 (E.D. Tex. May 19, 2009)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00153, Dkt. No. 203
Decided
May 19, 2009
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER - The court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of thepatents. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each other'sclaim construction…
Length
26 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. Introduction In this case, the plaintiffs, Versata Softwa re, Inc., Versata Development Group, Inc., and Versata Computer Industry Solutio ns, Inc. (collectively, “Versata”), contend that SAP America, Inc., and SAP AG (collectively, “SAP”), infringe various claims of Unite d States Patent Nos. 5,708,798 (“the ‘798 patent”), 6,002,854 (“the ‘854 patent”), 5,878,400 (“the ‘400 patent”), 6,553,350 B2 (“the ‘350 patent”), and 7,069,235 (“the ‘235 patent”).