Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00153 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2011)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00153, Dkt. No. 585
Decided
September 23, 2011
Judge
Charles Everingham IV, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION on Costs
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Versata Software, Inc., Versata Development Group, Inc., and Versata Computer Industry Solutions, Inc. (collectively, Versata), contested bill of costs and memorandum of law in support the reof. (Dkt. No. 580 -9.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Versata’s bill of costs. I. BACKGROUND The Court entered a final judgment in this case on September 9, 2011, and awarded costs to the prevailing party, Versata. ( Dkt. No. 576). On September 16, 2011, Versata submitted its bill of costs. Defendants SAP America, Inc.