Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00153 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2011)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants SAP America, Inc. ‟s and SAP AG ‟s (collectively, “SAP”) motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on the issues relating to no pre -suit damages and new trial due to an absence of constructive or actual notice under section 287(a) (Dkt. No. 558). Having carefully considered the parties‟ submissions, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error