Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Versata Software, Inc. et al v. SAP America, Inc. et al, No. 2:07-cv-00153 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00153, Dkt. No. 574
Decided
September 9, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Defendants SAP America, Inc.s and SAP AGs (collectively, SAP) motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) on the issues relating to no pre-suit damages and new trial due to an absence of constructive or actu…
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants SAP America, Inc. ‟s and SAP AG ‟s (collectively, “SAP”) motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on the issues relating to no pre -suit damages and new trial due to an absence of constructive or actual notice under section 287(a) (Dkt. No. 558). Having carefully considered the parties‟ submissions, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.