Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC v. Alixa Rx LLC et al, No. 4:15-cv-00766 (E.D. Tex. July 24, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:15-cv-00766, Dkt. No. 280
Decided
July 24, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 197 Amended SEALED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment that the Patents in Suit are Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 filed by Golden Gate National Senior Care, Fillmore Strategic Investors, LLC, Fillmore Strateg…
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment That the Patents in Suit are Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. #197). After reviewing the relevant pleadings, the Court denies Defendants’ motion. BACKGROUND Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC (“Tech Pharm acy”) asserts Defendants infringed twelve claims from five patents that share a common specification. Specifically, Tech Pharmacy asserts Claims 7, 9, and 10 from U.S. Patent No. 7,698,019 (the “’019 Patent”); Claims 5, 7, and 8 from U.S. Patent No.