Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC v. Alixa Rx LLC et al, No. 4:15-cv-00766 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 17, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:15-cv-00766, Dkt. No. 110
Decided
October 17, 2016
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 68 SEALED MOTION for Protective Order filed by Golden Gate National Senior Care, Alixa Rx LLC. The Court finds is Defendants Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. #68) is hereby DENIED
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant A lixa RX LLC and Defendant Golden Gate National Senior Care LLC’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. #68). After reviewing the relevant pleadings, the Court finds the motion should be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC (“T ech Pharmacy”) filed its complaint against Defendants, alleging direct, indirect, and willful infringement of seven United States Patents: U.S. Patent Nos.