Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC v. Alixa Rx LLC et al, No. 4:15-cv-00766 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 7, 2017)

Denied
Discovery Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:15-cv-00766, Dkt. No. 299
Decided
August 7, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 190 SEALED MOTION Motion for Sanctions for Spoliation filed by Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC. Tech Pharmacy Services, LLCs Motion for Sanctions and Spoliation (Dkt. #190) is DENIED.It is further ORDERED that De…
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC’s (“Tech Pharmacy”) Motion for Sanctions and Spoliation (Dkt. #190). After reviewing the relevant pleadings, the Court denies Tech Pharmacy’s motion. BACKGROUND A central element in proving Tech Pharmacy’s infringement claims is the presence of a “separate and removable container” in front of Defendant Alixa Rx LLC’s (“Alixa”) automated dispensing unit (“ADU”) machine.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case