Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC v. Alixa Rx LLC et al, No. 4:15-cv-00766 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2017)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:15-cv-00766, Dkt. No. 284
Decided
August 2, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granted in Part and Denied in Part re 178 SEALED MOTION to Exclude and/or Strike Testimony of Defendants' Designated Expert Witness David Kvancz filed by Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC. Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC …
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC’s (“Tech Pharmacy”) Motion to Exclude and/or Strike Testimony of Defendant s’ Designated Expert Witness David Kvancz (Dkt. #178). After reviewing the re levant pleadings, the Court grants in part and denies in part Tech Pharmacy’s motion. BACKGROUND On March 10, 2017, Tech Pharmacy filed the present motion (Dkt. #178). On March 23, 2017, Defendants filed a response (Dkt. #202). On March 30, 2017, Tech Pharmacy filed a reply (Dkt. #216). On April 5, 2017, Defendants filed a sur-reply (Dkt. #228).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case