Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC v. Alixa Rx LLC et al, No. 4:15-cv-00766 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:15-cv-00766, Dkt. No. 296
Decided
August 3, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 179 SEALED MOTION to Exclude and/or Strike Testimony of Defendants' Designated Expert Witness Christopher J. Thomsen filed by Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC. Tech Pharmacy Services, LLCs Motion to Strike and/or …
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Tech Pharmacy Services, LLC’s (“Tech Pharmacy”) Motion to Strike and/or Exclude Tes timony of Defendants’ Designated Expert Witness Christopher J. Thomsen (Dkt. #179). After reviewing the releva nt pleadings, the Court grants in part and denies in part Tech Pharmacy’s motion. BACKGROUND On March 10, 2017, Tech Pharmacy filed the present motion (Dkt. #179). On March 22, 2017, Defendants filed a response (Dkt. #199). On March 29, 2017, Tech Pharmacy filed a reply (Dkt. #214). On April 5, 2017, Defendants filed a sur-reply (Dkt.