Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00195 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00195, Dkt. No. 323
Decided
July 3, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying Defendants' 118 Motions to Strike and Exclude Testimony of Dr. Mohamed Helaoui and 119 Dr. Vijay Madisetti
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Strike and Exclude Testimony of Dr. Mohamed Helaoui (Dkt. No. 118) and Dr. Vijay Madisetti (Dkt. No. 119) . In the Motions, Defendants argue that testing by Dr. Helaoui and Dr. Madisetti contains improperly disclosed infringement theories, was performed with undisclosed testing apparatus, and was not performed against the accused products or claimed invention. Having considered the Motions, and for the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES both motions. I.