Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00195 (E.D. Tex. June 14, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00195, Dkt. No. 307
Decided
June 14, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying 99 Motion to Strike
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Dr. Scott J. Savage. Dkt. No. 99. In the Motion, Defendants request that the Court strike the testimony of Dr. Savage, Plaintiff’s survey expert, because it is said to contain late -disclosed survey evidence, and it is not tied to the underlying facts of the case. Id. Having considered the Motion, and for the reasons disused below, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion should be, and hereby is, DENIED. I.