Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00195 (E.D. Tex. July 2, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. David Ricketts . Dkt. No. 105. In the Motion, Plaintiff contends that t he opinions of Defendants’ Non-Infringing Alternatives Expert, Dr. Ricketts, are sufficiently unreliable and flawed to warrant exclusion under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert. Id. at 1. Having considered Plaintiff’s Motion, and for the reasons assigned below, the Motion is DENIED, except for the late-disclosed NIA’s discussed below. I.