Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00195 (E.D. Tex. June 17, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Mr. David Kennedy. Dkt. No. 101. In their Motion, Defendants contend that the opinions of Plaintiff’s damages expert, Mr. David Kennedy, are sufficiently unreliable and flawed to warrant exclusion under Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 702 and Daubert . Id. at 1. Having considered the Motion, and for the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion should be, and hereby is, DENIED. I.