Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00195 (E.D. Tex. June 30, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00195, Dkt. No. 314
Decided
June 30, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 108 Sealed Motion to Exclude Testimony
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Lauren R. Kindler. Dkt. No. 108. In the Motion, Plaintiff contends that the opinions of Defendants’ Damages Expert, Lauren R. Kindler, are sufficiently unreliable and flawed to warrant exclusion under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert. Id. at 1. Having considered Plaintiff’s Motion, and for the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that the Motion should be, and hereby is, DENIED. I.